steveloughran commented on issue #23938: [MINOR][DOCS] Clarify that Spark apps should mark Spark as a 'provided' dependency, not package it URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23938#issuecomment-469420938 sorry, yeah, spark. Even if the spark team doesn't redist those JARs, it'd be *really useful* if the release process published the POM. that way, if you want your build to pick up the exact set of dependencies which are in sync with spark, excluding all the stuff which will cause grief, you'd just add it as a dependency.
---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] With regards, Apache Git Services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
