Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4014#discussion_r23910154
  
    --- Diff: 
sql/hive/v0.12.0/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/Shim12.scala ---
    @@ -241,8 +241,14 @@ private[hive] object HiveShim {
           Decimal(hdoi.getPrimitiveJavaObject(data).bigDecimalValue())
         }
       }
    +
    +  implicit def prepareWritable(shimW: ShimWritable): Writable = {
    +    shimW.writable
    +  }
     }
     
    +case class ShimWritable(writable: Writable)
    --- End diff --
    
    If we skip `ShimWriteable`, we then need to remove `implicit` from 
`prepareWriteable` and explicitly call it to do the fixing. Is it better? If 
so, I can do it in this way.
    
    It does not break Hive 12 because we just pass the underlying writable 
object without touching it. We only do the fixing on Hive 13.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to