Github user saucam commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4469#issuecomment-73839872
Hi @liancheng , thanks for the comments. We are using spark-1.2.1 and the
old parquet support is being used. Can this be merged so that we have proper
partitioning with different locations as well. I tried partitioning on 2
columns and it worked fine (Also applied this patch for specifying a different
location)
On a different note, When I create a parquet table with smallint type in
spark, the schema being used in parquet shows 'int32 type', is that by design
in spark or its a parquet limitation ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
