On 2024-12-10, at 13:52, John Mattsson <john.mattsson=40ericsson....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > • Internet-drafts are obviously "permanent and readily available", I > don’t see why that is debated. For registries wanting RFCs there is “RFC > required”. I am against any registry saying that "permanent and readily > available" internet-drafts are NOT OK, but pointing to a website outside of > the IETF is…
This. There really can’t be any discussion on the facts here. Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list -- rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to rfc-interest-le...@rfc-editor.org
