Hi,This web site is now back in operation. I was told that it was down for maintenance.
Eliot On 06.12.2024 11:29, Eliot Lear wrote:
FYI I have contacted the authors and asked CSTC to kick their HTTP server. Eliot On 06.12.2024 00:58, Michael Richardson wrote:S Moonesamy<sm+i...@elandsys.com> wrote: >> 1. Mandatory-to-implement algorithms MUST have a stable public >> specification and public documentation that has been well studied, >> giving rise to significant confidence. > 2. The IETF has always had a preference for unencumbered algorithms. > The IETF Community would have to agree on what the first sentence means. In > my opinion, the second sentence shouldn't be too much of a problem. However, > it would be better not to lose sight of it or else it's gong to be > half-a-solution. The recently published rfc9563 references SM2, which is an ITU-T for fee document, with an english translation which does seem to not load for me. http://www.gmbz.org.cn/upload/2024-11-18/1731899501687024253.pdf I would prefer that "Specification Required" included the words "available", and for which the principles of open-stand.org applied. -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [ ]m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [ _______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list --rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email torfc-interest-le...@rfc-editor.org_______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list --rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email torfc-interest-le...@rfc-editor.org
OpenPGP_0x87B66B46D9D27A33.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list -- rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to rfc-interest-le...@rfc-editor.org
