I like that maneuver. On Tue, Dec 10, 2024, 3:41 PM Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> And this is where we run into problems, because the moment you change that > boiler plate, you will devalue the RFC series > > I don’t know about that. The general population seems unable to tell the > difference among the various RFC streams, as well as drafts and not. > > But if necessary, one possible fix is this: > > It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material **for > other than IETF purposes** or to cite them other than as "work in > progress." > _______________________________________________ > saag mailing list -- s...@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to saag-le...@ietf.org >
_______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list -- rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to rfc-interest-le...@rfc-editor.org
