Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
    > I don’t know about that. The general population seems unable to tell
    > the difference among the various RFC streams, as well as drafts and
    > not.

ha. Very cynical ha.

    > But if necessary, one possible fix is this:

    } It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material *for
    } other than IETF purposes* or to cite them other than as "work in
    } progress."

That's good.
I don't know where that gets us: is assignment of values an IETF Purpose?
When the I-D is a personal one?  Still I prefer an I-D over
http://geocities.com/rsalz/my-pet-protocol.txt

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list -- rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rfc-interest-le...@rfc-editor.org

Reply via email to