Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > I don’t know about that. The general population seems unable to tell > the difference among the various RFC streams, as well as drafts and > not.
ha. Very cynical ha. > But if necessary, one possible fix is this: } It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material *for } other than IETF purposes* or to cite them other than as "work in } progress." That's good. I don't know where that gets us: is assignment of values an IETF Purpose? When the I-D is a personal one? Still I prefer an I-D over http://geocities.com/rsalz/my-pet-protocol.txt -- Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list -- rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to rfc-interest-le...@rfc-editor.org