>but the fact remains that "the way things are arranged here" is *different* 
>from what is described in our founding process document. And it's just weird 
>that we don't update that document to formally permit what we actually do.

As of the last IETF, we have proposed documents for revising 2026 and 2418 and 
the disposition was to have WG-forming BoF. Nobody's stepped up to help write 
the BoF proposal.


_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list -- rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rfc-interest-le...@rfc-editor.org

Reply via email to