On 12-Dec-24 02:27, Carsten Bormann wrote:
On 2024-12-11, at 13:56, Eliot Lear <l...@lear.ch> wrote:
For what it's worth, I have far less of a problem with IANA assignments to
drafts than I do with drafts not being considered working documents.
I believe the magical solution to all this is:
Make no changes.
The way things are arranged here kind of works, even if ugly in come corners,
and nobody has yet come up with a proposed change that would actually improve
the outcome.
I believe that's correct (and I suspect that Mike StJohns's description is pretty much
accurate) but the fact remains that "the way things are arranged here" is
*different* from what is described in our founding process document. And it's just weird
that we don't update that document to formally permit what we actually do.
See
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/XJk2nBsWS08hth8FBl0eaQOe7m8/
Brian
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list -- rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rfc-interest-le...@rfc-editor.org
