I 100% agree with this for Markdown. If we agree we are doing copy-edit in and the Markdown tools reflow the text when generating XML, I care less about that.
-Ekr On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 1:37 PM Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> wrote: > Or the RPC could not reformat the source code other than when adding text, > and then only on the line where the text is added. From the perspective of > an author, any other reformatting makes it significantly harder to do > reviews in AUTH48. Speaking from recent experience. > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025, at 11:52 AM, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@vpnc.org> wrote: > > This thread has become very author-hostile. "You are forced to deal > > with changes that are being made to match some people's preferred > > viewing of your source material." > > That's exactly what the RPC does today. > > If the author hasn't used NSNL, then ANY diff the RPC produces is going to > be > harder to view. In order to minimize that, they could do NSNL in their > editing. Whether or not they reformat EVERYTHING is another question. > > > _______________________________________________ > rfc-interest mailing list -- rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org > To unsubscribe send an email to rfc-interest-le...@rfc-editor.org > > > _______________________________________________ > rfc-interest mailing list -- rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org > To unsubscribe send an email to rfc-interest-le...@rfc-editor.org >
_______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list -- rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to rfc-interest-le...@rfc-editor.org
