Right, that's an edit required to fix the output, so it would count as "an 
edit" as opposed to "a reflow". And regarding C-M-q, I have been guilty of the 
same thing when editing docs because my fingers just do it, and then I wind up 
regretting it later. So I've gotten in the habit of actually hitting undo when 
that happens. :]

On Thu, Apr 24, 2025, at 2:41 PM, Jean Mahoney wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> On 4/24/25 3:36 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> > Or the RPC could not reformat the source code other than when adding 
> > text, and then only on the line where the text is added.
> 
> [JM] The RPC may need to update artwork and sourcecode (or ask the 
> authors to update) to ensure that they fit within the column limit set 
> by xml2rfc.
> 
> The RPC validates four types of sourcecode: YANG, MIB, XML, and ABNF. 
> The RPC formats and validates YANG modules using pyang [1]. The RPC will 
> also check and update the formatting of ABNF so that it can be validated 
> with bap [2].
> 
> Best regards,
> Jean
> 
> [1] https://github.com/mbj4668/pyang
> [2] https://author-tools.ietf.org/abnf
> 
> > From the 
> > perspective of an author, any other reformatting makes it significantly 
> > harder to do reviews in AUTH48. Speaking from recent experience.
> > 
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025, at 11:52 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> >> Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@vpnc.org <mailto:paul.hoff...@vpnc.org>> wrote:
> >>     > This thread has become very author-hostile. "You are forced to deal
> >>     > with changes that are being made to match some people's preferred
> >>     > viewing of your source material."
> >>
> >> That's exactly what the RPC does today.
> >>
> >> If the author hasn't used NSNL, then ANY diff the RPC produces is 
> >> going to be
> >> harder to view.  In order to minimize that, they could do NSNL in their
> >> editing.   Whether or not they reformat EVERYTHING is another question.
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rfc-interest mailing list -- rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org <mailto:rfc- 
> >> inter...@rfc-editor.org>
> >> To unsubscribe send an email to rfc-interest-le...@rfc-editor.org 
> >> <mailto:rfc-interest-le...@rfc-editor.org>
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > rfc-interest mailing list -- rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to rfc-interest-le...@rfc-editor.org
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list -- rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rfc-interest-le...@rfc-editor.org

Reply via email to