On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 10:07 -0600, inode0 wrote: > On 12/19/06, MJang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Folks, > > > > One more yum related question - just took a look at the RHUP304 course > > outline, and that includes coverage of yum repositories. > > > > That suggests to me that Red Hat will encourage the use of local yum > > repositories, which IMO would make the RHN Proxy unnecessary. > > > > Will RHN Proxy continue with RHEL 5? > > Will Red Hat feed updates to your local yum repository? Or their > packages at all? I guess I don't see why using local yum repos, which > one can do now anyway, would make a proxy server less valuable?!
An RHN Proxy doesn't get fed. It's basically a squid cache that fetches from RHN when a package is first requested, then serves from the cache from then on. _______________________________________________ rhelv5-beta-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-beta-list
