Greg Swift wrote:
ImagePlace IT wrote:
Greetings,

Please except my apologies for being off topic. I'm looking for a pointer to recommended practices. (With an explanation and attached question).

I need to configure a vsftpd service denying anonymous logins and sharing nothing. That is, customers get a username, password and a dir, with full permissions, without the ability to see other dirs.

Q: How to create and manage usernames and passwords without giving them a system user/group account? Or should I give the system account and deny shell logins and access to other services etc...?
You can do what Anthony recommended, but imho there is no reason to generate nologin accounts for ftp access. Personally I have been using pure-ftpd (http://www.pureftpd.org/) for my ftp server. Its a very stable, and very secure (i've had no issues, and my use is as an isp). It gives you all kinds of control over what the users are doing, and provides true virtual user support, in or out of a chroot environment. You can backend it with a simple auth file, or backend with a db or ldap.

unfortunately its not an rpm install (unless u try using fedora's extra package, which I havent).

i'm not affiliated in any way.. i just think it blows vsftpd out of the water.

-greg

Thank you all for your info. A pureftpd implementation looks rather capable. Looks to allow scalability, manageability and reliability which therefore eases my backup and disaster recovery routines. (Specific to the ftp service). However, the lack of a Red Hat issued RPM is grounds for at least a second thought due to the inherent advantages to that methodology.

Looks like a fork in the road here. Pondering whether to use the system UID/GID or diverge from Red Hat recommendations...

Breaking the RH RPM methodology will require a new level of procedure and documentation... hmm... Always a function of time for me. Ha Ha Ha.

Thanks again for the info.

Jeff

_______________________________________________
rhelv5-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list

Reply via email to