Though I still think the keymap is handicapped, I've now worked around
my problem like this:
# Casting a Boo callable to Converter<string,string>
component "myFactory", GenericFactory[of Converter[of string,
string]]:
_t = Converter[of string, string]({ x | transform(x) })
component "bar", Converter[of string, string]:
_createUsing @myFactory.Create
component x:
_parameters:
__Map:
___map(keymap) = {
____"foo": @bar
___}
GenericFactory is an empty, generic vehicle:
public class GenericFactory<T>
{
private readonly T _t;
public GenericFactory(T t) { _t = t; }
public T Create() { return _t; }
}
Now I'm able to setup a map of transformation rules through a
dictionary of callables in my boo file, what I was actually after :)
On Apr 23, 4:22 pm, Grimace of Despair <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Come to think of it, I already circumvented the restriction before, by
> using the component version (version 2 in my sample).
>
> But in my current setup, I haven't been able to, because MyObject is a
> delegate, and I haven't been able to create that through a component
> (just yet)
>
> On Apr 23, 4:16 pm, Grimace of Despair <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > I've actually got a kind of deamon which loads Binsor applications
> > like aspnet_wp would load ASP.NET applications (though not nearly as
> > advanced). This setup allows me writing (copmiled) class libraries
> > that do the nitpicking, while being able to throw them around within
> > different configuration settings. Just to say that the running code is
> > actually container-agnostic, and stuff like custom dependencies would
> > have to be taken care of by my daemon.
>
> > Now for the custom dependencies: I guess that can't be done in Binsor,
> > or am I missing something?
>
> > On Apr 23, 2:49 pm, Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Not sure if this helps, but the parameters and configuration sections in
> > > binsor are used to expose the corresponding configuration model supported
> > > in
> > > MK. I don't believe custom conversions are handled for the values.
> > > However, when using Binsor, I generally only use those sections for
> > > Facility configurations that are already based on configuration.
> > > Otherwise,
> > > I just set the dependencies directly. These could be anything and just
> > > get
> > > added to the custom dependencies collection and bound directly at
> > > resolution
> > > time
> > > craig
>
> > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Grimace of Despair <
>
> > > [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > The following string to string mapping works fine for me:
>
> > > > component x:
> > > > _parameters:
> > > > __Map:
> > > > ___map(keymap) = {
> > > > ____"foo": "bar"
> > > > ___}
>
> > > > A string to component map also does:
>
> > > > component bar
> > > > component x:
> > > > _parameters:
> > > > __Map:
> > > > ___map(keymap) = {
> > > > ____"foo": @bar
> > > > ___}
>
> > > > Now I'm trying to pass in a custom, non-primitive object:
> > > > component x:
> > > > _parameters:
> > > > __Map:
> > > > ___map(keymap) = {
> > > > ____"foo": MyObject()
> > > > ___}
>
> > > > This fails with:
>
> > > > Castle.MicroKernel.SubSystems.Conversion.ConverterException: No
> > > > converter registered to handle the type MyObject.
>
> > > > I've done a little digging, and there are two remarks I have:
>
> > > > 1. KeyMapBuilder relies on ConfigurationHelper.SetConfigurationValue,
> > > > which converts MyObject to a string, losing any reference to the
> > > > actual object. Most probably, there's a really logical explanation for
> > > > this scenario, but to me, it seems that the map gets severely limited
> > > > by the use of the said SetConfigurationValue.
>
> > > > 2. Even if the value was not converted to a string, the
> > > > GenericDictionaryConverter might not be able to use the original
> > > > value, because it does a PerformConversion. Afaics (but I might be
> > > > wrong), this method won't handle the conversion because no converter
> > > > exist, while the value would already be of the correct type.
>
> > > > Could it be that I'm trying to push things? I can imagine the
> > > > ConfigurationHelper uses string conversions for a reason, but the
> > > > inability to use custom objects in the map ... well... it sucks :)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Rhino Tools Dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
