There is an Cu Ka2 elimination algorithm described in:
J.Appl.Cryst. 8 (1975) p.499-506 by J.Ladell, A.Zagofsky and S.Pearlman
====================================================
Marek W. Schmidt
Department of Applied Mathematics
Research School of Physical Sciences and Engineering
Australian National University
====================================================
On Fri, 12 Feb 1999, Nita DRAGOE wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am in a search for references concerning Kalpha 2 stripping methods
> (except that one of Rachinger from 1930 or so...). I would appreciate
> if someone points me in the right direction.
>
> Another question (easy ?) for people more in the knowledge than me:
>
> In a typical laboratory XRD experiment (without incident
> monochromator) one get the overlap of the diffraction with Ka1 and Ka2
> (neglect Kbeta now).
> If we separate these two contributions and assume that Ka2 is a
> statistically "independent" experiment we can obtain two data sets (I
> think we can assume that they are "independent", is the ergodic(?)
> theory). If we make Rietveld refinement on both of them we should get
> the results with different standard deviations since sin(theta)/lambda
> and intensities are different.
> What do you think is the relation between Rwp of these two data sets
> and the original (i.e. overlapped) one ?
> Because I don't know why this procedure is not applied I guess it is
> meaningless. Why ?
>
> Thanks for comments,
> N
> --
> Nita DRAGOE
> http://www.hongo.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~tdragoe
> ____________________________________________________
>
