Dear Alan, The authors may have their own evidences and responsibilities, but when they try supporting their hypothesis by crystallography, this must be done correctly, especially in IUCr journals. As for your secret belief in triclinic nature of all crystals, I’d say that they are not crystals at all since they have boundaries ;)
Best wishes, Leonid ******************************************************* Leonid A. Solovyov Institute of Chemistry and Chemical Technology 660036, Akademgorodok 50/24, Krasnoyarsk, Russia http://sites.google.com/site/solovyovleonid ******************************************************* ________________________________ From: Alan Hewat <[email protected]> To: Leonid Solovyov <[email protected]> Cc: Lista Rietveld <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2015 3:32 PM Subject: Re: On the “crystallographic good practices” Dear Leonid. You have a point, but they also have other evidence for lower symmetry. (Personally I have for long believed, secretly, that all structures were at best triclinic, and that everything else was just an average :-) I know you like to be provocative, but let's not start a little war over this. Normally the referees and journals, together with the authors, are responsible for what they publish. Best wishes, Alan.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <[email protected]> Send commands to <[email protected]> eg: HELP as the subject with no body text The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
