> On 23 Jun 2015, at 22:22, Khalifah, Peter <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Preferred orientation results in the central assumption that the measured
> intensity is proportional to the reflection structure being violated,
This is actually quite new to me as definition of preferred orientation or
better texture. Until now I thought that in the case of preferred orientations
the measured intensity is proportional to the volume fraction of grains
oriented in a certain direction…….
> As many people will tell you, it is much more effective to eliminate
> preferred orientation (though improved sample preparation) than to try to
> model it.
We actually use preferred orientation (texture) to help structure solution, and
I found more easy to model them than to eliminate them. But may be is just me.
Best regards,
Luca Lutterotti
-----------------------Luca
Lutterotti--------------------------------------------
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale, Universita' di Trento,
via Sommarive 9, 38123 Trento, Italy
Temporary address:
Laboratoire CRISMAT-ENSICAEN, Université de Caen Basse-Normandie, Campus 2
6, Bd. M. Juin 14050 Caen, France
e-mail address : [email protected]
Home page : http://www5.unitn.it/People/en/Web/Persona/PER0004735
New Maud page : http://maud.radiographema.com
Phone number :+39-0461-28-2414
Fax : +39-0461-28-1977------------------------------------------------------
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <[email protected]>
Send commands to <[email protected]> eg: HELP as the subject with no body text
The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
