Dear all,

I have been following this conversation with a lot of interest over the last 
few days, I did not know much about the early days of powder diffraction and 
how profile refinement methods were born and evolved and I have learnt many 
things.
I just want to thank everyone who contributed to the conversation for sharing 
their stories, viewpoints and experiences.

Best,
Marco
________________________________
Da: [email protected] <[email protected]> per conto di Alan 
Hewat <[email protected]>
Inviato: sabato 18 agosto 2018 12:22
A: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Oggetto: Re: Rietveld

> As I get older, I believe less and less in legends  (AH)
> ...the aristocracy of powder diffractionists is displaced (AleB)

I don't believe in aristocracy either :-) After Bill David, Lambert van Eijck 
and I published Hugo Rietveld's glowing 
obituary<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.iucr.org%2Fj%2Fissues%2F2016%2F04%2F00%2Fes0421%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7C5f8b089e12274e89097208d604f4b001%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636701846301998770&sdata=hvORMZva8k0zJDlsy3%2BKGIbCvPwEuquMVTEh4yyEyMQ%3D&reserved=0>,
 I received a rough draft of the vL&S 
paper<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fjournals.iucr.org%2Fa%2Fissues%2F2018%2F02%2F00%2Fib5058%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7C5f8b089e12274e89097208d604f4b001%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636701846301998770&sdata=wc2FDF7TcotSvx7P1mx9Vf5KhXczQPo2s3GY5TubhnY%3D&reserved=0>,
 and was frankly shocked. But after finding that others shared those views, I 
suggested a re-write of the paper to make it (perhaps) less controversial and 
more historical, supported where possible with evidence from the literature. 
Still, the paper seemed to address questions I myself had about the legend.

1) How could a young man, educated as a classical crystallographer (Bragg 
peaks, structure factors, Fourier transforms...) produce the revolutionary idea 
of simply refining the structure to fit the observed profile ? None of the 
professional crystallographers I knew accepted that idea - only physicists and 
chemists who used crystallography as a tool. It was a naive physicist's 
approach.

2) How could Rietveld (1967) in his first paper not emphasise this 
revolutionary departure from classical crystallographic techniques ? It was 
almost as if he didn't consider that refining  magnetic moments and atom 
displacements was real crystallography, just a refinement problem where 
compromises had to be made to get a required result with an inadequate computer.

3) Why did Rietveld leave science in 1974 if he thought that he had achieved 
something remarkable ? He had a permanent job at a well funded laboratory and a 
technique that would eventually revolutionise powder diffraction. Ordinary 
people like me couldn't even get a job at Cambridge (thanks Mike :-) and had to 
live with a succession of 3 year contracts in foreign countries.

When I first knew Hugo, he was a modest, unassuming man, unlike Loopstra who 
apparently pushed hard. When he saw that "The response was slight, or, rather, 
non-existent" perhaps like other crystallographers for 20 years he himself 
doubted the value of profile refinement.

And no I don't think the crystallographic establishment should get to name it. 
Everyone knows what "profile refinement" means.

On Sat, 18 Aug 2018 at 11:29, Le Bail Armel 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hi,



>As I get older, I believe less and less in legends. In the IUCr 1999 issue 
>that I cited, I should have also mentioned that there is an interesting 
>article on p.4 called "The Powder Diffraction 
>Handicap<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fww1.iucr.org%2Fnews%2Fv7n4%2F7-4.pdf&data=02%7C01%7C%7C5f8b089e12274e89097208d604f4b001%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636701846301998770&sdata=69s33ntMgaupjJSK8ktv0pBspV0Q3hrs7%2FzH6KCLDQU%3D&reserved=0>"
> by Armel le Bail :-)



Indeed, "never say never" is verified again. The powder diffraction handicap 
(overlapping) can be considered as suppressed by XFEL

https://www.xfel.eu/<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.xfel.eu%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7C5f8b089e12274e89097208d604f4b001%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636701846301998770&sdata=HEff3HVx0smjSYIlEE7lTYtr95qqa2QbLRN0%2BJVFjpk%3D&reserved=0>
 where each single microcrystal of the powder produces 3D diffraction data, and 
all data are recombined !

But for solving too simple problems, you will not have access to that 
overloaded machine and will have to continue to use your laboratory powder 
diffractometer and (now) classical approaches.



So, once again, the aristocracy of powder diffractionists is displaced, this 
time from third generation synchrotron to XFEL, amusing, new legends will be 
built, probably.



Best,



Armel



++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <[email protected]>
Send commands to <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> eg: HELP as the 
subject with no body text
The Rietveld_L list archive is on 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mail-archive.com%2Frietveld_l%40ill.fr%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7C5f8b089e12274e89097208d604f4b001%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636701846301998770&sdata=FtC%2FKA%2FGklrjbBQGcaRquFj5H1UXbLaAidj1WmcxIAM%3D&reserved=0>
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++



--
______________________________________________
   Dr Alan Hewat, NeutronOptics, Grenoble, FRANCE
<[email protected]> +33.476.98.41.68
        
http://www.NeutronOptics.com/hewat<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.NeutronOptics.com%2Fhewat&data=02%7C01%7C%7C5f8b089e12274e89097208d604f4b001%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636701846301998770&sdata=lRf4Ta0H4SxzDGmpKSW2ci8M7XoDVEVSHMiGQ%2BXycTo%3D&reserved=0>
______________________________________________
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <[email protected]>
Send commands to <[email protected]> eg: HELP as the subject with no body text
The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Reply via email to