It does help me decide when I'm not 100% clear in my head about the
scope and the implications. As I see it now, no harm can be done to
ad it :-)
On 6-dec-05, at 20:32, Eddy Young wrote:
Geert Bevin wrote:
Just for clarity, why would you think that this would be bad:
getXhtmlTemplate()
When you can already write this now, which does the same the previous
method would do:
getXhtmlTemplate(getElementInfo().getId());
I was not aware that this method existed as I've never had to use it.
But yes, if it does basically the same, I don't think you even need
our
consentment as it is a natural progression.
Eddy
_______________________________________________
Rife-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.uwyn.com/mailman/listinfo/rife-users
--
Geert Bevin Uwyn bvba
"Use what you need" Avenue de Scailmont 34
http://www.uwyn.com 7170 Manage, Belgium
gbevin[remove] at uwyn dot com Tel +32 64 84 80 03
PGP Fingerprint : 4E21 6399 CD9E A384 6619 719A C8F4 D40D 309F D6A9
Public PGP key : available at servers pgp.mit.edu, wwwkeys.pgp.net
_______________________________________________
Rife-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.uwyn.com/mailman/listinfo/rife-users
