----- On May 10, 2016, at 2:50 PM, Guillaume Roguez 
guillaume.rog...@savoirfairelinux.com wrote:

>> Yuri wrote:
>>> On 05/10/2016 07:08, Stepan Salenikovich wrote:
>>> >Hi,
>>> >Thanks for the heads up. What are the possible alternatives for a c++ dbus
>>> >library (which does not require heavy dependencies such as qt or glib)?
>>> >
>>> >Please note that the Ring codebase is based on sflphone, which dates back 
>>> >to
>>> >2004 (though I didn't search to see when dbus was integrated).
>>> >
>>> >Also, I noticed the last message on the sourceforge mailing list mentioned
>>> >moving the repo to github, which does have recent commits, possibly its
>>> >somewhat maintained there now?
>>> >https://sourceforge.net/p/dbus-cplusplus/mailman/message/34731100/
>>> >https://github.com/andreas-volz/dbus-cplusplus
>>> 
>>> I actually don't know anything about dbus-cplusplus. I tried to make the
>>> FreeBSD port and hit this issue. I know that if there is no package for it,
>>> this means that pretty much nobody is using it.
>> 
>> dbus is a heavyweight IPC library developed to enable
>> notifications for the freedesktop project and is used
>> by systemd for its init system and managing services.
>> 
>> It may be worth finding options to disable it for
>> environments that don't need or want it's capabilities.
>> 
>> That said, despite its complexity dbus is also considered stable
>> since its massive API is the basis for a huge edifice of
>> software.
>> 
>> Joel
>> 
>>> Yuri
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ring mailing list
>>> Ring@lists.savoirfairelinux.net
>>> https://lists.savoirfairelinux.net/mailman/listinfo/ring
>> 
>> --
>> Joel Roth
>>  
>> 
> 
> 
> Notice we're talking about dbus-c++, the C++ binding library of DBus and not
> DBus by itself.
> As mentioned by Stepan Salenikovich, it seems that this library has gained 
> some
> patches last year.
> But distributions may haven't seen that or not supporting it (like FreeBSD).
> 
> A quick look about distributions supported by SFL Ring Team:
> 
> Fedora: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/dbus-c++/
> Debian:
> https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=dbus-c%2B%2B&searchon=names&suite=unstable&section=all
> Ubuntu:
> http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=dbus-c%2B%2B&searchon=names&suite=xenial&section=all
> 
> Even ArchLinux has also it.
> 
> Maybe it could be a good idea to add dbus-c++ into our contrib system to make
> life easier for non-supported distributions.

I have created an enhacement request for this here:
https://tuleap.ring.cx/plugins/tracker/?aid=677

> 
> -Guillaume
> _______________________________________________
> Ring mailing list
> Ring@lists.savoirfairelinux.net
> https://lists.savoirfairelinux.net/mailman/listinfo/ring
_______________________________________________
Ring mailing list
Ring@lists.savoirfairelinux.net
https://lists.savoirfairelinux.net/mailman/listinfo/ring

Reply via email to