Brian

So you think the WG's own mechanisms would be enough to police my concern?

If so that works for me.

Regards

Michele, who is an incredible pessimist at times

--
Mr Michele Neylon

Blacknight Solutions

Hosting, Colocation & Domains

https://www.blacknight.com
https://blacknight.blog /

http://ceo.hosting/

Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072

Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090

-------------------------------

Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park, Sleaty 
Road, Graiguecullen, Carlow, R93 X265,Ireland  Company No.: 370845

On 04/06/2020, 12:06, "Brian Nisbet" <[email protected]> wrote:

    All,

    Two things on this, both with my "Internet citizen and NCC Member" hat 
firmly on.

    First off, I'm in favour of the change, I think this is very welcome.

    Secondly, I would be against this having any requirements other than 
someone being a WG Co-Chair. While there is work to be done there, as HPH 
discussed at RIPE80, tying it into this proposal would be wrong. The right 
point to discuss things like participation etc. is when the Co-Chair is being 
chosen. It would be awful if a WG chose someone and then a different regulation 
said that they couldn't avail of this subsidy.

    Thanks,

    Brian

    Brian Nisbet
    Service Operations Manager
    HEAnet CLG, Ireland's National Education and Research Network
    1st Floor, 5 George's Dock, IFSC, Dublin D01 X8N7, Ireland
    +35316609040 [email protected] www.heanet.ie
    Registered in Ireland, No. 275301. CRA No. 20036270

    ________________________________________
    From: ripe-list <[email protected]> on behalf of Michele Neylon - 
Blacknight <[email protected]>
    Sent: Thursday 4 June 2020 11:56
    To: [email protected]; [email protected]
    Subject: Re: [ripe-list] RIPE Working Group Chair Financial Support call 
for consensus by 15 June 2020

    CAUTION[External]: This email originated from outside of the organisation. 
Do not click on links or open the attachments unless you recognise the sender 
and know the content is safe.

    I think this isn’t a bad idea, but my only concern would be how easy it 
could be to abuse.

    The process for fellowships states that one of the criteria is “need of 
financial assistance”, but how is that decided?

    I know this topic was brought up in the past and there were quite a few 
people who were vocally opposed to it.

    Personally I’d agree that finances should not be a blocker if someone was 
willing to step up and commit to chairing a WG

    I do, however, worry that some people could be tempted to use the financial 
support as their only motivation for being a WG chair, which is obviously the 
wrong way around.

    So maybe having something in the policy  / process about the person having 
some kind of track record?

    With the fellowship RIPE is looking for “fresh blood’ and it’s completely 
appropriate that the barriers be set at a particular level.

    However in this instance it’s seeking to provide financial support to 
existing community members, so setting some criteria around past participation 
wouldn’t be inappropriate in my opinion.

    Regards

    Michele


    --
    Mr Michele Neylon
    Blacknight Solutions
    Hosting, Colocation & Domains
    https://www.blacknight.com
    https://blacknight.blog /
    http://ceo.hosting/
    Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
    Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
    -------------------------------
    Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park, 
Sleaty Road, Graiguecullen, Carlow, R93 X265,Ireland  Company No.: 370845

    From: ripe-list <[email protected]> on behalf of Hans Petter Holen 
<[email protected]>
    Reply to: Hans Petter Holen <[email protected]>
    Date: Thursday 4 June 2020 at 11:08
    To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
    Subject: [ripe-list] RIPE Working Group Chair Financial Support call for 
consensus by 15 June 2020


    To follow up on the proposal the community plenary at RIPE 80, to provide 
financial support  Working Group (WG) Chairs if needed, I would like community 
input.

    The presentation can be seen at 7:45 into the video at 
https://ripe80.ripe.net/archives/video/383/<https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fripe80.ripe.net%2Farchives%2Fvideo%2F383%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cbrian.nisbet%40heanet.ie%7C6f3b038ca2fc4d74e3a408d80876030f%7Ccd9e8269dfb648e082538b7baf8d3391%7C0%7C0%7C637268650247495153&sdata=%2FgZ13y7uWr9Ua35ETlEzrYWdF5Ls37rCD0CvGxAQdL4%3D&reserved=0>

    In principle, all RIPE Meeting attendees, including RIPE WG Chairs, 
Programme Committee members and presenters are expected to cover the costs of 
participating in a RIPE Meeting. However, in exceptional cases, for instance, 
if a WG would end up with no Chair during a meeting, a WG Chair can ask the 
RIPE Chair to request financial assistance from the RIPE NCC. This has mostly 
been limited to waiving the meeting fee, not for travel and accommodation.

    The matter was discussed at RIPE NCC Executive Board meeting December 2018 
after it was brought to the attention of the RIPE NCC Executive Board through 
one of its members. The board was positive to provide support also for travel 
and accommodation if needed, and tasked the RIPE Chair trough EB402 tasked to 
make a draft procedure.

    The proposal is modelled after the RIPE Fellowship program and can be found 
at:

    
https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/wg/cc/ripe-working-group-chair-financial-support<https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ripe.net%2Fparticipate%2Fripe%2Fwg%2Fcc%2Fripe-working-group-chair-financial-support&data=02%7C01%7Cbrian.nisbet%40heanet.ie%7C6f3b038ca2fc4d74e3a408d80876030f%7Ccd9e8269dfb648e082538b7baf8d3391%7C0%7C0%7C637268650247505143&sdata=5iumGxnETcndXRXzhmYlINozqO7YSCCAE%2F5mH8mRcdQ%3D&reserved=0>

    If there is consensus from the community on this I will do a formal request 
to the RIPE NCC for such support.

    Hans Petter Holen
    ad-interim RIPE  Chair



Reply via email to