> On 7 Feb 2021, at 22:04, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I agree that the chairs may decide that it may be "out of the scope of the > WG", but nothing else. Deciding something's “out of scope for the WG” can be a diplomatic way to avoid embarrassing the proposer(s). WG cochairs have the discretion to exercise that sort of common sense. Which doesn’t need to be written down the Big Book of RIPE Rules.
- [ripe-list] repeated and continued PDP ... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list
- Re: [ripe-list] repeated and conti... Sander Steffann
- Re: [ripe-list] repeated and c... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list
- Re: [ripe-list] repeated and c... Randy Bush
- Re: [ripe-list] repeated and c... Jim Reid
- Re: [ripe-list] repeated and conti... Nick Hilliard
- Re: [ripe-list] repeated and c... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list
- Re: [ripe-list] repeated a... Nick Hilliard
- Re: [ripe-list] repeat... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list
- Re: [ripe-list] repeated a... Jim Reid
- Re: [ripe-list] repeated and conti... Andy Davidson
- Re: [ripe-list] repeated and c... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list
- Re: [ripe-list] repeated a... Jim Reid
- Re: [ripe-list] repeat... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list
- Re: [ripe-list] repeated and c... Niall O'Reilly
- Re: [ripe-list] repeated a... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list
- Re: [ripe-list] repeat... Niall O'Reilly
- Re: [ripe-list] repeated a... Niall O'Reilly
- [ripe-list] a proposal to change t... Jim Reid
- Re: [ripe-list] a proposal to ... Maximilian Wilhelm
