Hi Andy, I proposed several choices in my first versions (Arbiters, then Board), but the staff suggested against ... I understood some of the points of the disagreement by the staff, but I'm still open to have it again if the community believes is the right way.
Regards, Jordi @jordipalet El 7/2/21 22:54, "ripe-list en nombre de Andy Davidson" <[email protected] en nombre de [email protected]> escribió: On 7 Feb 2021, at 13:05, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list <[email protected]> wrote: > ("Ensure Neutrality of PDP Appeals Procedure”) Hi, Jordi, all On your policy proposal: Is this something the Arbiters [0] could do well? Andy [0] http://ripe.net/about-us/legal/arbitration/list-of-arbiters ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
