The proposal is fundamentally flawed because it shows a very poor
understanding of how the PDP works. If/when a consensus judgement gets appealed
to the WG Co-chairs Collective, anyone on the WGCC who was involved in that
earlier judgement recuses themselves from the appeal. This is common sense and
doesn’t need to be written down.
[Jordi] It has not been the case in the first appeal we had. Chairs that
participated in the discussion, so voiced their opinion against the proposal
discussion (and of course I agree they should do it), haven't recused
themselves. Also, there are chances that "personal conflicts" happen and they
don't recuse themselves, so at least there must be the chance to ask for
recusing some of the chairs. Just look at legal systems. You can always, if you
expose a reason, to ask for a judge recusation, and also when you appeal, it is
a totally different set of judges from a totally different level. It is for
perfect reasonable reasons.
**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the
individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure,
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if
partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be
considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the
original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
