Hi Tome:While my English is not perfect, you really need work on
your understanding of the language.And since this not the subject we discuss
here, I will not future respond to you on the language skill.Lu HengChief
Executive Officer LARUS LimitedEmail [email protected] Office +852 2988 8918
Address A3, 11/F, TML Tower, Tsuen Wan, N.T, Hong Kong SARWebsite:
LARUS.netThis email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system
manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete
this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are
notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in
reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.---- On
Sun, 30 Oct 2022 03:05:18 +0800 Elad Cohen<[email protected]> wrote
---------BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Töma, Please refrain from
listing me in any group, thank you. This mailing list is not a debates club
and not a platform for arguments of each side, serious issues were raised,
please allow RIPE NCC to answer instead of creating noise and distraction.
Kind Regards, Elad ------- Original Message ------- On Saturday, October 29th,
2022 at 8:28 PM, Töma Gavrichenkov <[email protected]> wrote: > Peace, > >
On Sat, 29 Oct 2022, 6:40 pm Lu Heng, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Community
scrutiny does not in anyway means I speak for anyone else but by myself. > >
> Obviously it means exactly that, if it is a "community" scrutiny, and not a
"Lu Heng" scrutiny. > > This is kind of the definition of it, innit? > > A
community scrutiny is not a "community member" scrutiny. It is a process that
has been approved by rough consensus across the community. Otherwise the board
and the NCC would've been overwhelmed with individual requests under the
"community scrutiny" disguise. > > Your individual concern is your individual
concern. > > Before pretending that your e-mail is a "community scrutiny", you
should've had initiated a proper process in the community and evaluated the
outcome, if any. > > E.g. organizing a BoF session is an example of a
*beginning* of a proper process (to the contrary, and quite notably, submitting
a lightning talk candidate is not). You did not do that. > > Another way of
seeking confirmation that an issue, which is presumably important to you, is
also not nothing for the community is sending an e-mail about this issue to the
community mailing list and receiving support in feedback. You did send such an
e-mail 5 days ago, but the support you've received since then is hardly
distinguishable from none. > > If this is a community request, then the
community we're speaking of is basically you, Elad, and in any case no more
than 2 more individuals. Not the RIPE community. > > -- > Töma -----BEGIN PGP
SIGNATURE----- Version: ProtonMail
wnUEARYKAAYFAmNdeVkAIQkQj6WtEth1vqMWIQQHtrd3aktNVejGGPiPpa0S
2HW+o5/aAQCHvdQeOMoZL0NN2MFJJVjrIR2bZ90tyVhM72eLDuyKoAD+KM9i
lEGDB5e96HpFOHqNxdKLJj3PY3laiP9TY77drgE= =uiV3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your
subscription options, please visit:
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ripe-list
