There was another thread running some time ago where various people reported how often EAC reported having to re-read what are otherwise pristine looking CDs.
Here is what I said: > My experience with EAC was that 20% of my CDs came through with no > errors recorded in the log. 20% of my CDs had significant error rates > (many tracks, many errors). About 60% of CDs had "some" errors - a > couple of tracks and error rates around 0.1%. There is nothing special > about my CD collection - I have always taken good care of them, so I > see no reason to think my experience is not representative om the > "good" side. Other's experience was that this was high and had seen little in the way of track quality below 100%. EAC "Track quality" is a measure of how much re-reading is going on to ensure a replicated read. Fundamentally, it just depends on what you want out of the rip process. I don't plan on ripping again, so I want bit accuracy up front. I am happy to feed the CD player while it rips... so I am in no hurry. -- Eric Carroll Transporter-Bryston 3B SST-Paradigm Reference Studio 60 v.4 SB3-Rotel RB890-B&W Matrix 805 SB3-Pioneer VSX-49TXi-Mirage OM7+C2+R2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Carroll's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9293 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32266 _______________________________________________ ripping mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/ripping
