Mark Lanctot;188205 Wrote: > > Aha. I was going on what I managed to google. > That's ok, 30 micrometers would actually be 30,000 nanometers, so my mistake there. My head hurts thinking about it.
> > Excellent drawing and it would be great to use it. Perhaps we should > emphasize that the acrylic and lacquer coating is MUCH more fragile > than the polycarbonate, which is one of the toughest plastics around. > This would be instead of emphasizing that the acrylic/lacquer layer is > thin, which if your drawing is to scale, is NOT true. Thank you, I enjoyed making it. I wasn't sure if you'd like it so I kind of left it alone. I'll make the changes you suggested and it's yours. I'm having trouble finding an actual spec other than this*, which proves the transparent substrate is 1.2mm like the drawing you linked- not 1.2 overall like I thought. It seems the IEC 60908 spec cost $210**! There are some nice blurbs about read errors and damage size in the first link, fwiw. * http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/files/ECMA-ST/Ecma-130.pdf ** http://webstore.ansi.org/ansidocstore/product.asp?sku=IEC+60908+Ed.+2.0+b%3A1999 -- Skunk ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Skunk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2685 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=33618 _______________________________________________ ripping mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/ripping
