thomsens;246070 Wrote: 
> IMO, your reply just reinforces my belief.  No one else in my family
> would have the patience to even think about what you wrote, and few
> would have the technical capability to execute it...it's probably more
> accurate to say patience to figure out how to.   My experience is that
> the "experts" on this forum don't represent the vast majority of the
> folks I consult with that would like to have this capability.  As a
> result, I've come to realize that these types should pick the format
> that best suits them now - and that might not be FLAC.
> 
> I offered the additional information simply because no one else did. 
> Whether you agree or not is personal to you, but obviously may not
> represent the decision criteria most important to the original poster. 
> Since we don't know what they are, I figured I'd add more thoughts to
> balance the argument a little.  If he wants to listen to his music with
> the windows media player on his 2 windows computers, his portable
> windows compatible player and the squeezebox, then WMA may be less
> hassle and therefore better suited for him.

But of course he could use foobar2000, or lots of other applications,
to play flac as well. Pretty much everyone I know under 40 is
comfortable installing new apps on their computers, so I really don't
see this as being an overwhelming argument.


-- 
totoro

Perl is the Ron Jeremy of programming languages.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
totoro's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5935
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=40632

_______________________________________________
ripping mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/ripping

Reply via email to