Philip Meyer;378754 Wrote: > However, I am expecting the new schema will break a lot of things, and > the whole thing sounds like it will be a lot slower.
That's kind of what I expect as well. I hope we're wrong. >From what I've gathered, the new schema will read and store any and all tags found in the files. I you put it there, even if its a typo, it will be stored in the database. Then, on a per-library basis, you'll define a schema on top of the base schema, as well as some means of defining a hierarchy for your schema for browsing in the various interfaces. There will be one schema defined that mimics the current behavior. Maybe they'll also throw in one that is suited to handling classical music better. After that, you define your own schemas as you like. It sounds extremely flexible, but it also sounds like some simple capabilities could be lost. For instance, how would you be able to say 'group multi-disc albums'? You're going to still need special interpretations and behaviors hard coded in the server logic for certain recognizable tags. In that regard, I expect many of the same problems regarding how tags are interpreted and used by the server to continue. -- JJZolx Jim ------------------------------------------------------------------------ JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=57594 _______________________________________________ ripping mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/ripping
