Hi Geoff,

That sounds like the problem alright.  We talked about your solution  
and they didn't want a hard timed event.  I suggested that we could  
possibly do what you do but with a "make next", but the clock guy  
didn't want to make a bunch of new clocks, especially this close to  
going live (tonight at midnight).  (We have 48 different clocks that  
are mixed up to make each day of the week and weekends different.)

Anyway, he generated all the logs for the next week and just went in  
by hand and deleted the songs at the end of the day that went over.   
He claims that it only took him a few seconds for each one, so he  
isn't too worried about it.

Anyway, thanks again for the help!

-Scott


Quoting Geoff Barkman <[email protected]>:

> Hi Scott
> I had this very problem myself. this is how I solved it.
> Because the last event in the day is a generic... music in my case
> there was no hard (or soft) time associated it... it just flowed on
> from the previous event.... playing 3 or 4 songs after the the
> hour.... and also the next days clock starts with a hard or soft
> time... but of course because that clock doesn't load till after the
> event playing after midnight... it's time attributes are ignored.
>
> What I did is made 2 new clocks.
> Before Midnight and after midnight.
> Before Midnight is different from a normal clock in that it's very
> last event is hard timed event that plays a station ID, 1 second
> before midnight (23:59:59). Once this Station ID is played .... it
> loads the next day's log (After Midnight)... which doesn't have a hard
> timed event at the start.
>
> I hope this helps.
>
> Many thanks
> Geoff Barkman
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 5:38 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> The shortened clock slots fixed our short hours and that seems to be
>> running great now.  But now the last hour of the day is too long so
>> the chain to the next day doesn't happen until 3 or 4 songs into the
>> next day.  I don't think we have to chain exactly at Midnight but we
>> can't figure out how to make it chain right after whatever song is
>> playing at Midnight.  Can anyone tell us what we are missing this time?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>   -Scott
>>
>>
>> Quoting [email protected]:
>>
>>>
>>> Yes, we were confused about that.  Yesterday we changed all the slots
>>> so there aren't any over 5 minutes and today every hour has been filled.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>     -Scott
>>>
>>>
>>> Quoting Robert Orr <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>>> Not quite sure you understand how the internal scheduler fills slots.
>>>> If it sees a slot (pie slice), it puts a song of any length there. The
>>>> slot could be 10 seconds long. It would put one song of any length
>>>> there. The slot could be 35 minutes long... it would put one song of
>>>> any length there. It's merely the number of slots or pie slices that
>>>> determines how many songs will be placed per hour. If you want six
>>>> Bronze songs in the hour... put six Bronze pie slices of any  length
>>>> in the hour.
>>>>
>>>> Have a great day,
>>>> Robert
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 10:28 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for all of your replies!  We eliminated all of the 5 minutes
>>>>> and longer slots in the Gold group and it seems to be much better today.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have been watching it closely and it has been within a couple of
>>>>> minutes almost every hour today.  I have only seen one that was 5
>>>>> minutes early.
>>>>>
>>>>> @Alan - we don't have to be exact, we feel that +/- 5 minutes will be
>>>>> close enough.  The problem before was that it was often playing the
>>>>> top of the hour around 15 minutes early and we had a couple that were
>>>>> over 20 minutes early.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tomorrow we are going to eliminate the slots > 4 minutes in the
>>>>> OneHitWonder, Bronze, and Silver groups and I'm sure that will
>>>>> completely eliminate all the problems we had.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyway, thanks again to everyone for all of your help!  It sounds
>>>>> great! Rivendell is pretty amazing, we are planning to go live on Oct
>>>>> 1st.
>>>>>
>>>>>  -Scott
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Quoting Alan Peterson <[email protected]>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> It's a minor note, but one that is not so jarring to the listener's
>>>>>> ear: Place your shortest tunes into the last 5-8 or so minutes of
>>>>>> the hour. This way, if your Hard Update event has to cut off a song,
>>>>>>  it won't do so partway through a long-ish tune, which never sounds
>>>>>> good.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (I've always thought a prime reason the Box Tops' song "The Letter"
>>>>>> was a hit - other than its catchiness - was because it was 1:50,
>>>>>> which helped the jock 'cheat' his way to the network news if his
>>>>>> hour fell short.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW, what is running on your station that calls for a mandatory
>>>>>> 00:00 hit? If it's hourly news, could you not employ Rivendell's
>>>>>> slip-time playback? This way a song can make it to the end and the
>>>>>> news is still intact, although several seconds late.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -AP
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [email protected] > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You can have 20 three minute pie slices in the clock (if your songs
>>>>>> average over 3 minutes, that would mean your hour would have several
>>>>>>  minutes more than it needs... in Matthew's case that works out to
>>>>>> 63-65 minutes of music per hour) and if you have a hard timed event
>>>>>> either make next or start immediately at 59:59 it would skip the
>>>>>> last several songs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [email protected] > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is setup in the events to be hard timed to 59:56.6 to start
>>>>>> immediately even if the previous cart is still playing so that it
>>>>>> will fade out of the song to be ready for our legal id. It is also
>>>>>> setup with a Stop transition in case for some odd reason nothing was
>>>>>>  playing that it would wait to the top of the hour to play the legal
>>>>>>  id which is the next cart after this event.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Rivendell-dev mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://lists.rivendellaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Rivendell-dev mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://lists.rivendellaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Rivendell-dev mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.rivendellaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Rivendell-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.rivendellaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rivendell-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.rivendellaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Rivendell-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.rivendellaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev
>


_______________________________________________
Rivendell-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rivendellaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev

Reply via email to