On Fri, 25 Sep 2015, Frederick Gleason wrote:
On Sep 25, 2015, at 09:56 31, David Klann <[email protected]> wrote:
Which brings up the point from Aaron's original point claiming to need
to encode the audio at 192KHz. Aaron, why is it that you think you
need this high of a sample rate? 48KHz is better than CD quality which
has always been better than FM quality. Are you confusing sample rate
with compression bit-rate?
AFAICT, he’s wanting to use StereoTool to generate MPX composite, which
does require 192 ksample/sec because of the ultrasonic spectral
components involved (up to around 48 kHz baseband, more if the RDS
encoder feature is also used).
I understand tht the one-box radio station is the Holy Grain toward which
a lot of us seem to be striving... but I think the ide of an automation
syste that includes not only the equivalent of an Optimod or Omnia audio
processor but also a stereo generator is a bridge too far. The audio
processor/stereo generator should be a separate box that doesn't worry
about music libraries or program logs, I think.
Rob
_______________________________________________
Rivendell-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://caspian.paravelsystems.com/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev
