John McClain wrote: > I think "reasonably high bar for commit to ensure working social and > technical compatibility, and then faster PMC" is a reasonable place to > start (understanding that it may well be imposable to change once we > start....) > > I think "initial committer list == initial PPMC" is fine too. >
+1 > Jim Hurley wrote: >> I am +1 for this position/proposal. Can others on the list >> please state your opinion (I think this will be a healthy >> activity for us). >> >> Geir - I am assuming that we're going to make >> initial committer list == initial PPMC, though. Cool >> with that? >> >> thanks -Jim >> >> On Feb 16, 2007, at 5:21 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >>> On Feb 16, 2007, at 5:14 AM, Mark Brouwer wrote: >>> >>>> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >>>> >>>>> My personal taste lately is a reasonably high bar for commit to >>>>> ensure working social and technical compatibility, and then faster >>>>> PMC. >>>> >>>> Given the nature of the ASF and the high quality and consistency of the >>>> codebase brought in I'm inclined to go for you personal taste. >>>> >>>> In theory it might be possible to come up with a completely different >>>> process that would be a better fit, but for me it will be a waste of >>>> time to start thinking of that and why not try something that has >>>> proven >>>> itself on a few occasions. >>> >>> But note that the bar isn't really that high overall - to me it's >>> more about social compatibility than technical prowess, because >>> someone who understands their limits, works well with others, and is >>> willing to learn is a treasure :) >>> >>> geir >>> >>>> --Mark >> > >
