I agree as well.
Jim
On Feb 18, 2007, at 9:40 PM, John McClain wrote:
I think "reasonably high bar for commit to ensure working social
and technical compatibility, and then faster PMC" is a reasonable
place to start (understanding that it may well be imposable to
change once we start....)
I think "initial committer list == initial PPMC" is fine too.
Jim Hurley wrote:
I am +1 for this position/proposal. Can others on the list
please state your opinion (I think this will be a healthy
activity for us).
Geir - I am assuming that we're going to make
initial committer list == initial PPMC, though. Cool
with that?
thanks -Jim
On Feb 16, 2007, at 5:21 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Feb 16, 2007, at 5:14 AM, Mark Brouwer wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
My personal taste lately is a reasonably high bar for commit to
ensure working social and technical compatibility, and then
faster PMC.
Given the nature of the ASF and the high quality and consistency
of the
codebase brought in I'm inclined to go for you personal taste.
In theory it might be possible to come up with a completely
different
process that would be a better fit, but for me it will be a
waste of
time to start thinking of that and why not try something that
has proven
itself on a few occasions.
But note that the bar isn't really that high overall - to me it's
more about social compatibility than technical prowess, because
someone who understands their limits, works well with others, and
is willing to learn is a treasure :)
geir
--Mark
