+1 on the plan. IMO the lack of response is due to the lack of a release... :)
I don't think we'll see a lot of activity from the community until the project starts regular, visible code pushes and releases.
-iain On Aug 23, 2007, at 1:16 PM, Jim Hurley wrote:
Thanks Bob. I was just pausing to see if people would voice opinions (+1's (thanks Sam), 0s, or -1s with alternative directions related to the "shifting up a gear..." mail). I'd really appreciate some response (the silence is deafening) to know if there's support, apathy, or disagreement. If we're good with the AR1 path -- I'd like to start discussing the items and/or have someone take the lead on proposing answers/solutions to them. Ready to start the discussion on them immediately. In the meantime, I've started working on some updates to the incubator.apache.org/river project page (not visible yet). -Jim On Aug 23, 2007, at 2:49 PM, Bob Scheifler wrote:Jim Hurley wrote:If we do pursue a first short term incubator release (just temporarily labeling it "AR1" for now), here's a few of the things (questions, tasks) we'll need to tackle.A good start list. How do you want to go about answering the questions?- Bob
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
