+1 on the plan.
On Aug 24, 2007, at 9:39 AM, Iain Shigeoka wrote:
+1 on the plan.
IMO the lack of response is due to the lack of a release... :)
I don't think we'll see a lot of activity from the community until
the project starts regular, visible code pushes and releases.
-iain
On Aug 23, 2007, at 1:16 PM, Jim Hurley wrote:
Thanks Bob.
I was just pausing to see if people would voice opinions
(+1's (thanks Sam), 0s, or -1s with alternative directions
related to the "shifting up a gear..." mail). I'd really
appreciate some response (the silence is deafening)
to know if there's support, apathy, or disagreement.
If we're good with the AR1 path -- I'd like to start discussing
the items and/or have someone take the lead on proposing
answers/solutions to them. Ready to start the discussion on
them immediately.
In the meantime, I've started working on some updates
to the incubator.apache.org/river project page (not visible
yet).
-Jim
On Aug 23, 2007, at 2:49 PM, Bob Scheifler wrote:
Jim Hurley wrote:
If we do pursue a first short term incubator release (just
temporarily labeling it "AR1" for now), here's a few of the
things (questions, tasks) we'll need to tackle.
A good start list. How do you want to go about answering the
questions?
- Bob
