+1
On 8/24/07, Iain Shigeoka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 on the plan. > > IMO the lack of response is due to the lack of a release... :) > > I don't think we'll see a lot of activity from the community until > the project starts regular, visible code pushes and releases. > > -iain > > On Aug 23, 2007, at 1:16 PM, Jim Hurley wrote: > > > Thanks Bob. > > > > I was just pausing to see if people would voice opinions > > (+1's (thanks Sam), 0s, or -1s with alternative directions > > related to the "shifting up a gear..." mail). I'd really > > appreciate some response (the silence is deafening) > > to know if there's support, apathy, or disagreement. > > > > If we're good with the AR1 path -- I'd like to start discussing > > the items and/or have someone take the lead on proposing > > answers/solutions to them. Ready to start the discussion on > > them immediately. > > > > In the meantime, I've started working on some updates > > to the incubator.apache.org/river project page (not visible > > yet). > > > > -Jim > > > > > > On Aug 23, 2007, at 2:49 PM, Bob Scheifler wrote: > >> Jim Hurley wrote: > >>> If we do pursue a first short term incubator release (just > >>> temporarily labeling it "AR1" for now), here's a few of the > >>> things (questions, tasks) we'll need to tackle. > >> > >> A good start list. How do you want to go about answering the > >> questions? > >> > >> - Bob > > > > >
