On Sep 4, 2007, at 3:47 AM, Dan Creswell wrote:
Gregg Wonderly wrote:
Bob Scheifler wrote:
Gregg Wonderly wrote:
Perhaps in view that jar layouts may change further, there might be
an official directory of deprecated jars so that documentation and
discussions can focus on the nature of those jars?
Moving the existing deprecated jars (jini-core.jar, jini-ext.jar,
sdm-dl.jar, sun-util.jar) could break existing scripts/etc that
reference them, so if the desire is for AR1 to maintain maximum
compatibility, it would seem preferable to leave them where they
are.
Your call, but my thoughts are that there will already be some
changes
involved in testing and integrating AR1, for many. So, having to
change
some referred to directory structures, etc, may not be a big impact
overall.
What do the rest of the user-base think about this? ^^^
How much backward compatibility does everybody expect in this first
release?
Anybody out there?
Hey Dan-
My guess is that we haven't made enough substantive progress in this
(River) project yet to attract Jini users to these mailing lists. We
certainly
have some (who seem to be generally lurking), but it will not be
(IMHO) until
we get out a release or two before 'users' will start to be very
vocal on this
list.
It might be better to ask this at jini/javaspaces-users right now.
My 2c.
-Jim
