I've uploaded a new release candidate to my people area:
http://people.apache.org/~fbarnaby/river/2.1.1
Here's what I've changed:
- Removed references in info-index.html related to
former (now obsolete) installation process.
- Removed top-level docs from source distribution.
- Fixed issues in release notes related to outrigger
logstore and snaplogstore.
- Fixed a typo in outrigger's package.html .
- Added note to top-level build.xml referring users
to doc/build.html for build instructions.
I've also uploaded the Rat output.
Frank
On Jan 4, 2008, at 07:50, Jim Hurley wrote:
Thanks very much for the quick response and guidance.
-Jim
On Jan 3, 2008, at 11:16 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Jan 4, 2008 5:45 AM, Jim Hurley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any words of advice from those more familiar with Apache incubator
releases? Is this (including "incubating" in the directory name,
basically matching the download name), common practice?
It's a common practice to have the name of the packaged directory
match the name of the package, i.e.
apache-river-2.1.1-incubating-src.zip to apache-river-2.1.1-
incubating
(or even apache-river-2.1.1-incubating-src).
Or an ASF requirement?
No.
I understand (and agree) with Niclas' point - but honestly hoping we
can get AR1 out and move on (to AR2) without many other changes.
In other words, can we put this off to AR2?
Yes.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
------------------------
On Jan 4, 2008, at 2:58 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Friday 04 January 2008 11:45, Jim Hurley wrote:
I understand (and agree) with Niclas' point - but honestly hoping we
can get
AR1 out and move on (to AR2) without many other changes. In other
words,
can we put this off to AR2?
As I pointed out originally, it is something that doesn't need to
hold up the
current release, but something I would like to see in the future to
receive
my +1 vote.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
