Hi, On Dec 31, 2007 12:01 PM, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think a short "licensed to ASF under Apache License v2.0" would be better.
I think we can do that. Though I wouldn't consider this a blocker for 2.1.1-incubating, i.e. no need to roll a new release candidate. > Ok, so each and *all* contributors to the ServiceUI project have either; > > a) Made a copyright assign to Bill or Artima, which in turn has a Software > Grant to ASF, OR > b) Signed off to change the license from SCSL to ALv2 prior to coming > to ASF, OR > c) Provided a Software Grant, for their contribution, to the ASF. AFAIK the ServiceUI API and code was mostly, if not completely, written by Bill Venners based on input from various people (see http://www.artima.com/jini/serviceui/acknowledgments.html). At least I recall checking that only Bill was mentioned as the @author of the class files when the contribution was included (see RIVER-10). I guess Bill can clarify the contribution history of ServiceUI. > Everyone, sorry for being a pain in the butt, but this is what ASF is all > about when it comes its legal respect among our downstream users. No problem, your input is much appreciated! :-) BR, Jukka Zitting
