I vote for sooner rather than more complete
Jim Waldo
On Oct 8, 2008, at 9:10 AM, Mike Morris wrote:
Dan Creswell wrote:
Be worth digging out the recent discussion around AR2, I believe
several
others are working towards getting this sorted. See the archives and
specifically the thread titled "AR2".
I presume you are referring to the discussion initiated by Jim
Hurley around 11 Sept and the thread initiated by Dennis Reedy back
in Jul/Aug.
I see therein a consensus (of only a few voices;-) to rather get a
release out rather than wait until all the Jira issues "officially
scheduled" for AR2 are closed. (I also note some discussion around
improving tests, but that's a bit out of my spheres of competence or
interest.) I didn't see anything where anyone said "OK let's do
AR2", hence sticking my head in the noose ;-)
So let me call for a vote: Do we feel we're ready to cut the next
release
[ ] soon, even though it means leaving out some issues for AR3
[ ] only after we've nailed all the issues currently scheduled for AR2
--
mike morris :: mikro2nd (at) gmail (dot) com
http://mikro2nd.net/
http://mikro2nd.net/blog/planb/
http://mikro2nd.net/blog/mike/
This email is [X]bloggable [ ]ask-first [ ]private
