(non-binding)
[X] soon, even though it means leaving out some issues for AR3
Dan Rollo
Mike Morris wrote:
Dan Creswell wrote:
Be worth digging out the recent discussion around AR2, I believe several
others are working towards getting this sorted. See the archives and
specifically the thread titled "AR2".
I presume you are referring to the discussion initiated by Jim Hurley
around 11 Sept and the thread initiated by Dennis Reedy back in Jul/Aug.
I see therein a consensus (of only a few voices;-) to rather get a
release out rather than wait until all the Jira issues "officially
scheduled" for AR2 are closed. (I also note some discussion around
improving tests, but that's a bit out of my spheres of competence or
interest.) I didn't see anything where anyone said "OK let's do AR2",
hence sticking my head in the noose ;-)
So let me call for a vote: Do we feel we're ready to cut the next release
[ ] soon, even though it means leaving out some issues for AR3
[ ] only after we've nailed all the issues currently scheduled for AR2
