On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:31 AM, David Welton <dav...@dedasys.com> wrote:
> > The current version number is 0.8.0, but sometime in the past someone > > (David?) created a 1_0 branch. I think we should eventually release with > a > > number that won't bring confusion or misunderstandings when we create a > new > > branch out of the trunk. > > Let's go ahead and call it 1.0 or even 2.0. > > How about calling it version 1.1 instead? Then it won't seem like such a large jump. Publishing a fresh tarball with an identifiable version number will allow more users to begin trying it out and giving feedback, even if we know there might be issues. It's not practical for some people to use software that is not available as an RPM, FreeBSD port, deb, etc--lacking published tarballs is currently blocking those distribution methods from existing.
