1.1 was also my proposal. Damon suggested 2.0 instead on the argument
that such a version number would make clear that this release is meant
to work also with Apache 2.x.
-- Massimo
On 04/27/2010 10:44 PM, Jeff Lawson wrote:
How about calling it version 1.1 instead? Then it won't seem like
such a large jump.
Publishing a fresh tarball with an identifiable version number will
allow more users to begin trying it out and giving feedback, even if
we know there might be issues. It's not practical for some people to
use software that is not available as an RPM, FreeBSD port, deb,
etc--lacking published tarballs is currently blocking those
distribution methods from existing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: rivet-dev-unsubscr...@tcl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: rivet-dev-h...@tcl.apache.org
