On 9/16/15, 11:58 AM, "Massimo Manghi" <massimo.man...@unipr.it> wrote:
> > >On 09/16/2015 04:37 PM, Karl Lehenbauer wrote: >> Hi Massimo, >> >> I want to affirm your comments from the 11th that there needs to be a >> way to to terminate the child process or thread if code detects that >> things have gotten wonky. We do this, for instance, on failure to >> obtain a database connection during page processing startup and on >> any uncaught traceback within the guts of our top level >> traceback-handling code. >> >> Karl >> > >So Karl, you're in favor of the idea of terminating the process anyway >without configuration option to enable/disable this behavior and without >going to the AbortScript stage. Is it correct? > > -- Massimo I don¹t have an opinion about how it should be implemented or whether or not it should be configurable, I just think it¹s important for Tcl code to be able to say ³I have lost faith in the viability of this child process or thread and I want it to terminate.² It doesn¹t have to be ³exit², either; it could be ³terminate_child² or whatever. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: rivet-dev-unsubscr...@tcl.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: rivet-dev-h...@tcl.apache.org
