Silviu Marin-Caea wrote:
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplayer10/
Nu mai e nevoie de nspluginwrapper pe browserele de 64 de biti. Merge si
wmode...
_______________________________________________
RLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lug.ro/mailman/listinfo/rlug
Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Dennis J. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But that's the point. For quite a few people browser stability actually
*decreases* when nspluginwrapper is installed.
No... your browser lives... the flash plugin dies.
Without the wrapper... if the flash plugin does something crash-worthy
it crashes firefox completely. The way the wrapper works..flash
dies..the browser lives.
-jef
inca niste commenturi, pt cei care nu sint abonati la listele fedora:
nspluginwrapper development is still important. This is because
nspluginwrapper runs plugins in a separate process, enabling the browser
to survive inevitable plugin bugs, and also the possibility of
additional security through security policy isolation of that separate
process. Fedora 8+ has run all plugins, even native 32bit-on-32bit,
wrapped in nspluginwrapper for this purpose.
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/nspluginwrapper-d...
nspluginwrapper development discussion here. Please report your problems
running the latest nspluginwrapper (currently 1.1.4) here. Gwenole is
very good about responding to reports, often with patches to try.
If you don't want to deal with reporting bugs, you are free to remove
nspluginwrapper. But then you have to live with the browser crashes.
http://macromedia.mplug.org/
I maintain a list of tips and workarounds to workaround Flash problems
here.
Warren Togami
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
experience: noun - what you get from learning from failure
_______________________________________________
RLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lug.ro/mailman/listinfo/rlug
