Silviu Marin-Caea wrote:
On Thursday 20 November 2008 15:42:56 lonely wolf wrote:
nspluginwrapper development is still important. This is because
nspluginwrapper runs plugins in a separate process, enabling the browser
to survive inevitable plugin bugs, and also the possibility of
additional security through security policy isolation of that separate
process. Fedora 8+ has run all plugins, even native 32bit-on-32bit,
wrapped in nspluginwrapper for this purpose.
Teoria e frumoasa, practica e altfel.
exact. de cind ai inceput sa crezi fara sa mesteci bullshitul pe care il
spun vinzatorii ?
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-November/msg01186.html
recomand in special ultimele mesaje din thread
Cand se blocheaza plugin-ul, ingheata si browserul. E adevarat ca isi revine
dupa ce este omorat procesul cu plugin-ul.
Dar blocarile pluginului se intampla in mare parte din cauza folosirii
wrapper-ului!
Eu inclin sa-l cred pe meseriasu care a facut portarea Flash-ului pe 64 de
biti.
http://www.kaourantin.net/2008/11/64-bits.html
"More importantly performance and user experience is pretty bad when the
plugin is wrapped. Why? Lots of data needs to be transfered through IPC
channels."
--
experience: noun - what you get from learning from failure
_______________________________________________
RLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lug.ro/mailman/listinfo/rlug
