On Thursday 20 November 2008 15:42:56 lonely wolf wrote: > nspluginwrapper development is still important. This is because > nspluginwrapper runs plugins in a separate process, enabling the browser > to survive inevitable plugin bugs, and also the possibility of > additional security through security policy isolation of that separate > process. Fedora 8+ has run all plugins, even native 32bit-on-32bit, > wrapped in nspluginwrapper for this purpose.
Teoria e frumoasa, practica e altfel. Cand se blocheaza plugin-ul, ingheata si browserul. E adevarat ca isi revine dupa ce este omorat procesul cu plugin-ul. Dar blocarile pluginului se intampla in mare parte din cauza folosirii wrapper-ului! Eu inclin sa-l cred pe meseriasu care a facut portarea Flash-ului pe 64 de biti. http://www.kaourantin.net/2008/11/64-bits.html "More importantly performance and user experience is pretty bad when the plugin is wrapped. Why? Lots of data needs to be transfered through IPC channels." _______________________________________________ RLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lug.ro/mailman/listinfo/rlug
