On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Matei Conovici wrote:
> bind
> ----
>
> Run Resolved Failed Queries/sec
> 1 61063 4473 28.00
> 2 61056 7 1221.00
> 3 61049 0 1650.00
> 4 61049 0 1650.00
> 5 61049 0 1696.00
> 6 61049 0 1650.00
> 7 61049 0 1696.00
> 8 61049 0 1696.00
> 9 61049 0 1696.00
> 10 61049 0 1650.00
>
> Average rate (all runs) : 1463.30 queries/sec
> Average rate (error free runs): 1673.00 queries/sec
>
> dnscache
> --------
>
> Run Resolved Failed Queries/sec
> 1 64662 874 36.00
> 2 64661 1 965.00
> 3 64660 0 1026.00
> 4 64660 0 979.00
> 5 64660 0 1010.00
> 6 64660 0 1010.00
> 7 64660 0 979.00
> 8 64660 0 950.00
> 9 64660 0 950.00
> 10 64658 2 702.00
>
> Average rate (all runs) : 860.70 queries/sec
> Average rate (error free runs): 986.29 queries/sec
>
> O sa mai fac si alte teste, ar ajuta daca ati face si voi :-)
> Oricum, nu nameserverul pare sa fie bottleneck pentru squid.
>
poti sa atasezi si incarcarea memoriei si a procesorului ?
----------------------------
Mihai RUSU
RoEduNet Network Engineer
"... and what if this is as good as it gets ?"
---
Send e-mail to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with 'unsubscribe rlug' to
unsubscribe from this list.
