Sean McGrath wrote: > Please no more processing instructions! I'm an elements, attributes and > text person. I build everything I can with those three and only step > outside it for compatability with other specs.
I think that in the absence of the feature you describe below, a PI is the better way to go. But I'd be grateful if we could avoid the debate entirely :) > What the world could really do with is a standard root element with an > open content model from which to hang various pieces of processing > meta-data as attributes. A long, long time ago, there was talk of having headers be a standard part of XML document, through some form of xml:head element. It would have indeed been, but unfortunately it didn't make the cut. Other people took the idea and ran with it, but unfortunately they made it for Web Services only. -- Robin Berjon Senior Research Scientist Expway, http://expway.com/ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rng-users/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
