Henri Sivonen wrote:
The current approach of expecting everyone to use UTF-8 or UTF-16 with BOM is much simpler and works already. There is no good excuse for not using UTF-8.
Yes and no. There are still some legacy systems that have problems with UTF-8. Supporting them doesn't add any complexity to proposal IMHO. I think that support for encoding parameter in XInclude and unparsed-text() (XPath 2.0) function shows that there is still demand (albeit quite small) for this feature.
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jirka Kosek e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kosek.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------ Profesionální školení a poradenství v oblasti technologií XML. Podívejte se na náš nově spuštěný web http://DocBook.cz Podrobný přehled školení http://xmlguru.cz/skoleni/ ------------------------------------------------------------------
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
